Independent Assurance Practitioner's Report on Selected Key Performance Indicators
To the Directors of Sappi Limited
Report on Selected Key Performance Indicators
We have undertaken a limited assurance engagement on selected key performance indicators (KPIs), as described below, and presented in the Sappi Group Sustainability Report 2019 of Sappi Limited (Sappi) for the year ended September 2019 (the Report). This engagement was conducted by a multidisciplinary team including environmental, safety and assurance specialists with relevant experience in sustainability reporting.
We have been engaged to provide a limited assurance conclusion in our report on the following selected KPIs, marked with a 'LA' on page 5 of the Report. The selected KPIs described below have been prepared in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative Standards ('GRI Standards') that accompanies the sustainability information on the relevant pages of the Report (the accompanying Sappi reporting criteria).
Scope of the KPIs prepared for the 2019 reporting period
|Category||Selected KPIs||Coverage/Reporting Boundary|
|Environment||Direct emissions (Scope 1) tCO2e||Sappi Global (Total Group)|
|Indirect emissions (Scope 2) tCO2e|
|Safety||Employee (Own) LTIFR (rate)||Sappi Global (Total Group)|
|Contractor LTIFR (rate)|
The Directors are responsible for the selection, preparation and presentation of the selected KPIs in accordance with the accompanying Sappi reporting criteria. This responsibility includes the identification of stakeholders and stakeholder requirements, material issues, commitments with respect to sustainability performance and design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation of the Report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. The Directors are also responsible for determining the appropriateness of the measurement and reporting criteria in view of the intended users of the selected KPIs and for ensuring that those criteria are publicly available to the Report users.
Greenhouse gas emissions quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.
Our Independence and Quality Control
We have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements of Sections 290 and 291 of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors' Code of Professional Conduct for Registered Auditors (Revised January 2018) and parts 1 and 3 of the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors' Code of Professional Conduct for Registered Auditors (Revised November 2018) (together the IRBA Codes), which are founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour. The IRBA Codes are consistent with the corresponding sections of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) respectively.
KPMG applies the International Standard on Quality Control 1, and accordingly maintains a comprehensive system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Our responsibility is to express a limited assurance conclusion on the selected KPIs based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained. We conducted our assurance engagement in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information (ISAE 3000 (Revised), and the carbon emission assurance portion of our engagement in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3410, Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements (ISAE 3410) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. These Standards requires that we plan and perform our engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the selected KPIs are free from material misstatement.
A limited assurance engagement undertaken in accordance with ISAE 3000 (Revised) and ISAE 3410 involves assessing the suitability in the circumstances of Sappi's use of its reporting criteria as the basis of preparation for the selected KPIs, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the selected KPIs whether due to fraud or error, responding to the assessed risks as necessary in the circumstances, and evaluating the overall presentation of the selected KPIs. A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement in relation to both risk assessment procedures, including an understanding of internal control, and the procedures performed in response to the assessed risks. The procedures we performed were based on our professional judgement and included inquiries, observation of processes followed, inspection of documents, analytical procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or reconciling with underlying records.
Given the circumstances of the engagement, in performing the procedures listed above we:
- Interviewed management to obtain an understanding of the internal control environment, risk assessment process and information systems relevant to the sustainability reporting process;
- Inspected documentation to corroborate the statements of management in our interviews;
- Inspected supporting documentation on a sample basis and performed analytical procedures to evaluate the data generation and reporting processes against the reporting criteria;
- Evaluated the reasonableness and appropriateness of significant estimates and judgements made by the directors in the preparation of the selected KPIs; and
- Evaluated whether the selected KPIs presented in the Report are consistent with our overall knowledge and experience of sustainability management and performance at Sappi.
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing, and are less in extent than for a reasonable assurance engagement. As a result the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had we performed a reasonable assurance engagement. Accordingly, we do not express a reasonable assurance opinion about whether Sappi's selected KPIs have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the accompanying Sappi's reporting criteria.
Limited Assurance Conclusion
Based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained and subject to the inherent limitations outlined elsewhere in this report, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the selected KPIs as set out in the Subject Matter paragraph above for the year ended September 2019 are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with Sappi's reporting criteria.
The maintenance and integrity of the Sappi website is the responsibility of Sappi's management. Our procedures did not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, we accept no responsibility for any changes to either the information in the Report or our independent limited assurance report that may have occurred since the initial date of its presentation on the Sappi website.
Restriction of Liability
Our work has been undertaken to enable us to express a limited assurance conclusion on the selected KPIs to the Directors of Sappi in accordance with the terms of our engagement, and for no other purpose. We do not accept or assume liability to any party other than Sappi, for our work, for this report, or for the conclusion we have reached.
KPMG Services Proprietary Limited
Per PAH Lalla
Chartered Accountant (SA)
20 December 2019
85 Empire Road